This article discusses benefits and challenges of qualitative-interpretive research conducted in teams of outside (Northern) researchers and national (Southern) associates, in which the latter have considerable autonomy over research design and data generation. Reflecting on our collaboration with Burmese associates on arts-based workshops with violence-affected commu- nities in Myanmar, we discuss how structures and dynamics of power and trust- building shaped the research process and data interpretation. Our reflective analysis suggests that interpretivist research ‘by proxy’ is possible and can be highly enriching but depends upon sufficient time (and funding) for mean- ingful, long-term engagement with ‘local’ research collaborators, which our project lacked.
Publication year
2020
Abstract
ACCESS
File
Document
RS215_13698249.2020.pdf
(2.09 MB)
Access
“Open” means that the resource is available to view, but please check the weblink for restrictions on use. “Restricted” means that the resource is not openly accessible to all, but you can purchase a copy, or your organisation might have an institutional subscription.
Source
Bliesemann de Guevara, B., Furnari, E., & Julian, R. (2020). Researching with ‘Local’ Associates: Power, Trust and Data in an Interpretive Project on Communities’ Conflict Knowledge in Myanmar. Civil Wars, 22(4), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2020.1755161
FURTHER INFORMATION
Source type
Keywords
Organisation(s)
Country
Language(s)