Why do some communities overtly declare their opposition to violent groups, while others disguise it by engaging in seemingly unrelated activities? Why do some communities manifest their dissent using nonviolent methods instead of organizing violence of their own? I argue that ideational factors are crucial to answering these questions: normative commitments can restrict civilian contention to nonviolent forms of action, while exposure to oppositional ideologies can push civilians toward more confrontational forms of noncooperation with armed groups. Furthermore, I contend that the role of political entrepreneurs activating and mobilizing this ideational content is crucial for it to shape contention. I support this argument with a wealth of microlevel evidence collected in various warzones in Colombia, analyzed within a purposively designed comparative structure. My findings support the growing conflict scholarship that stresses that ideology matters in war, but extends its application beyond armed actors’ behavior to that of civilian communities.
Publication year
2021
Abstract
ACCESS
File
Document
RS983_0010414020912.pdf
(11.12 MB)
Access
“Open” means that the resource is available to view, but please check the weblink for restrictions on use. “Restricted” means that the resource is not openly accessible to all, but you can purchase a copy, or your organisation might have an institutional subscription.
Source
Masullo, J. (2021). Civilian Contention in Civil War: How Ideational Factors Shape Community Responses to Armed Groups. Comparative Political Studies, 54(10), 1849-1884.
FURTHER INFORMATION
Source type
Country
Language(s)